Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Language Testing
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McNamara, T.F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Test dimensionality: IRT analysis of an ESP listening test1

T.F. McNamara

University of Melbourne

The use of Item Response Theory (IRT) in the examination of the qualities of language tests is a comparatively recent development, and one that has proved controversial. Oller (1983) contains no reference to IRT in a wide-ranging col lection. By contrast, IRT, particularly involving the family of models deriving from the work of Rasch (1960 [1980]), has featured in a number of studies since the early 1980s. Although Rasch IRT has sometimes been discussed primarily as a tool for improved investigation of the reliability of tests (Skehan, 1989), its potential for investigating aspects of the validity of language tests has also been demonstrated (McNamara, 1990a). The application of Rasch IRT in this latter role has in some cases met with objections based on what are claimed to be its unsatisfactory theoretical assumptions, in particular the so-called 'unidimensionality' assumption (Hamp-Lyons, 1989). In this paper, this issue will be discussed in the context of the analysis of data from an ESP listening test for health professionals, part of a larger test, the Occupational English Test (OET), developed on behalf of the Australian Government (McNamara, 1989b). The paper is in three sections. First, there is a brief description of the listening subtest of the OET. Second, the appropriateness of the use of Rasch IRT in language testing research is discussed. Third, the use of Rasch IRT in the validation of the listening subtest of the OET is reported. In this part of the paper, the issue of unidimensionality is considered in the context of analysis of data from the two parts of this test.

Language Testing, Vol. 8, No. 2, 139-159 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/026553229100800204


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Language TestingHome page
J. Read
The development of a new measure of L2 vocabulary knowledge
Language Testing, December 1, 1993; 10(3): 355 - 371.
[Abstract] [PDF]