|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Task and ability analysis as a basis for examining content and construct comparability in two EFL proficiency test batteries
Lyle F. Bachman
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Antony Kunnan Swathi Vanniaraian
University of California at Los Angeles
Brian Lynch
University of California at Los Angeles
This paper describes the content analysis undertaken as part of the Cambridge- TOEFL comparability study, the purpose of which is to examine the compara bility of two EFL test batteries.
Language Testing, Vol. 5, No. 2,
128-159 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/026553228800500203

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. F. Bachman, F. Davidson, and M. Milanovic
The use of test method characteristics in the content analysis and design of EFL proficiency tests
Language Testing,
July 1, 1996;
13(2):
125 - 150.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Jafarpur
Is C-testing superior to cloze?
Language Testing,
July 1, 1995;
12(2):
194 - 216.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. E. Ryan and L. F. Bachman
Differential item functioning on two tests of EFL proficiency
Language Testing,
June 1, 1992;
9(1):
12 - 29.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Henning
Comments on the comparability of TOEFL and Cambridge CPE
Language Testing,
December 1, 1989;
6(2):
217 - 222.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. F. Bachman, B. Lynch, and A. Kunnan
Response to Henning
Language Testing,
December 1, 1989;
6(2):
223 - 229.
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|