This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Scott, M. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Student affective reactions to oral language tests

University of California, Los Angeles

Many factors influence student reactions to tests, including format, length, time constraints, testing environment, familiarity with test format, perceptions of test validity, and student anxiety. The present study assessed the affective reactions of native Brazilian students to different oral EFL test formats (group and pair) in an achievement testing situation. Each student participated in both the group and the pair test formats and completed an affect questionnaire after each test. A principal factor analysis of student responses to the questionnaire revealed two major factors. The first appeared to involve cognitive judgements about the validity of the test and how well students liked the test. The other factor seemed to be emotive, and involved student reports of the anxiety they felt both before and after the test. Similarly, a qualitative analysis of student responses to open-ended items on the questionnaire found that students were mostly concerned about their emotional state, test content, and time constraints in the testing situation, while comments about test administrators accounted for only a small percentage of the total responses. A multivariate analysis of variance based on the results of the factor analysis showed no significant difference among student reactions to the different test formats.

Language Testing, Vol. 3, No. 1, 99-118 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/026553228600300105


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Fulcher Testing tasks: issues in task design and the group oral Language Testing, March 1, 1996; 13(1): 23 - 51. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Brown The role of test-taker feedback in the test development process: test-takers' reactions to a tape-mediated test of proficiency in spoken Japanese Language Testing, December 1, 1993; 10(3): 277 - 301. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Zeidner and M. Bensoussan College students' attitudes towards written versus oral tests of English as a Foreign Language Language Testing, June 1, 1988; 5(1): 100 - 114. [Abstract] [PDF]