Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Language Testing
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simms, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Richgels, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The syntactic density score revisited: which of its components matter in the oral language of 9-15 year olds?

Rochelle B. Simms

Louisiana State University

Donald J. Richgels

Louisiana State University

The Syntactic Density Score (SDS) is an index of language complexity computed from 10 variously weighted component variables. The SDS has been criticized as being redundant with one of its own component variables, as being arbitrarily weighted, and as having a serious scoring anomaly. The purposes of this study were to determine if group effects would be found by using the raw scores of the 10 variables without the weightings and to see which of these variables would contribute most to group differences among older children. Language samples from 72 learning disabled students and a matched group of normally achieving peers (age range 9.0 to 15.0) were analysed. A MANOVA revealed no significant overall effect for ability nor for ability X age inter action. These was, however, a significant effect of age. Discriminant analysis with stepwise variable selection identified gerunds, verbs, prepositional phrases and number of subordinate clauses per T-unit as components of the SDS which could be used to determine age group differences. Similar analysis of com ponent variables of the SDS is recommended for future studies, rather than using the derived SDS itself.

Language Testing, Vol. 3, No. 1, 39-53 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/026553228600300102


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?