Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Language Testing
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pae, T.-I.
Right arrow Articles by Park, G.-P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Examining the relationship between differential item functioning and differential test functioning

Tae-Il Pae

Yeungnam University, paet{at}yumail.ac.kr

Gi-Pyo Park

Soonchunhyang University

The present study utilized both the IRT-LR (item response theory likelihood ratio) and a series of CFA (confirmatory factor analysis) multi-sample analyses to systematically examine the relationships between DIF (differential item functioning) and DTF (differential test functioning) with a random sample of 15 000 Korean examinees. Specifically, DIF was detected using the IRT-LR method and the cumulative effect of DIF on DTF was gauged by the multi-sample analysis technique offered by the LISREL 8.5 program. The results of the current study indicate that item level DIF, once detected, may be carried to the test level bias regardless of the DIF directions, thereby showing mixed evidence to the previous findings reported in the literature. This suggests that the relation of DIF to DTF seems to be much more complex than that reported in the literature and, accordingly, more empirical studies are needed to bridge the gap in the literature about DIF-DTF relationships.

Language Testing, Vol. 23, No. 4, 475-496 (2006)
DOI: 10.1191/0265532206lt338oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
T.-I. Pae
Second Language Orientation and Self-Determination Theory: A Structural Analysis of the Factors Affecting Second Language Achievement
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, March 1, 2008; 27(1): 5 - 27.
[Abstract] [PDF]