This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Rupp, A. A. Articles by Choi, H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

How assessing reading comprehension with multiple-choice questions shapes the construct: a cognitive processing perspective

Humboldt University of Berlin, Andre.Rupp{at}IQB.hu-berlin.de

Tracy Ferne

University of Ottawa

Hyeran Choi

University of Ottawa

This article provides renewed converging empirical evidence for the hypothesis that asking test-takers to respond to text passages with multiple-choice questions induces response processes that are strikingly different from those that respondents would draw on when reading in non-testing contexts. Moreover, the article shows that the construct of reading comprehension is assessment specific and is fundamentally determined through item design and text selection. The data come from qualitative analyses of 10 cognitive interviews conducted with non-native adult English readers who were given three passages with several multiple-choice questions from the CanTEST, a large-scale language test used for admission and placement purposes in Canada, in a partially counter-balanced design. The analyses show that:

• There exist multiple different representations of the construct of ‘reading comprehension’ that are revealed through the characteristics of the items.

• Learners view responding to multiple-choice questions as a problem-solving task rather than a comprehension task.

• Learners select a variety of unconditional and conditional response strategies to deliberately select choices; and

• Learners combine a variety of mental resources interactively when determining an appropriate choice.

These findings support the development of response process models that are specific to different item types, the design of further experimental studies of test method effects on response processes, and the development of questionnaires that profile response processes and strategies specific to different item types.

Language Testing, Vol. 23, No. 4, 441-474 (2006)
DOI: 10.1191/0265532206lt337oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Plakans Discourse synthesis in integrated second language writing assessment Language Testing, October 1, 2009; 26(4): 561 - 587. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Yamada Lexical patterns in L2 textual gist identification assessment Language Testing, January 1, 2009; 26(1): 101 - 122. [Abstract] [PDF]