Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Language Testing
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krekeler, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Language for special academic purposes (LSAP) testing: the effect of background knowledge revisited

Christian Krekeler

Konstanz University of Applied Sciences, krekeler{at}fh-konstanz.de

This study investigates the effect of background knowledge in languages for specific academic purposes (LSAP) tests. Following the observation of previous studies that the effect of background knowledge varies according to the level of language proficiency, the study applied the theory of linguistic thresholds to LSAP reading tests. The research question was whether students would be able to draw on their background knowledge only at certain levels of second language (L2) proficiency. International students in Germany took part in a study based on two LSAP reading tests from different subject areas. The texts were subject specific but did not assume previous knowledge. Language proficiency was assessed by C-tests; background knowledge by three different variables. The effect of background knowledge on reading test performance was strong. Whilst the effect of background knowledge did vary somewhat according to the level of language proficiency, the findings were inconclusive in relation to possible thresholds. In the case of the employed LSAP tests, which were not highly specific, they were fuzzy or non-existent and the concept seems inappropriate in relation to language tests for academic purposes.

Language Testing, Vol. 23, No. 1, 99-130 (2006)
DOI: 10.1191/0265532206lt323oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?