Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Language Testing
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Uiterwijk, H.
Right arrow Articles by Vallen, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Linguistic sources of item bias for second generation immigrants in Dutch tests

Henny Uiterwijk

Citogroep, Arnhem, Henny.Uiterwijk{at}citogroep.nl

Ton Vallen

Tilburg University

This article reports the first results of a long-term research project focusing on the detection and possible linguistic causes of differential item functioning (DIF) for second generation immigrant students in the Final Test of Primary Education in the Netherlands. The main aim of the project is to provide test constructors with information which is as detailed as possible about sources of DIF in order to help them avoid item bias in future forms of the test. The project was carried out in three steps. First, DIF items were identified using two statistical procedures: IRT and Mantel-Haenszel. The second stage was an investigation of sources of DIF, beginning with an inventory of subject matter elements which can cause difficulty for immigrant students, according to previous educational research. This was followed by a careful evaluation of DIF items by the researchers and by external experts, and a think-aloud experiment with students. At the third stage, judges decided whether each DIF item was biased and thus reduced the construct validity of the test. The article concentrates on the classification of linguistic sources of DIF and a consideration of whether they work to the advantage or disadvantage of immigrant students.

Language Testing, Vol. 22, No. 2, 211-234 (2005)
DOI: 10.1191/0265532205lt301oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Topics in Early Childhood Special EducationHome page
C. Huaqing Qi and S. C. Marley
Differential Item Functioning Analysis of the Preschool Language Scale--4 Between English-Speaking Hispanic and European American Children From Low-Income Families
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, November 1, 2009; 29(3): 171 - 180.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language TestingHome page
A. Huhta, P. Kalaja, and A. Pitkanen-Huhta
Discursive construction of a high-stakes test: the many faces of a test-taker
Language Testing, July 1, 2006; 23(3): 326 - 350.
[Abstract] [PDF]