Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Language Testing
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Snellings, P.
Right arrow Articles by de Glopper, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Validating a test of second language written lexical retrieval: a new measure of fluency in written language production

Patrick Snellings

University of Amsterdam, P.Snellings{at}uva.nl

Amos van Gelderen

University of Amsterdam

Kees de Glopper

University of Groningen

Lexical retrieval is an essential subprocess of language production and crucial in fluent writing and speaking. In this study we discuss a new measure of the speed of written lexical retrieval in a second language, the Written Productive Translation Task (WPTT). In contrast to Picture Naming tasks, the WPTT is not restricted to concrete nouns and verbs that can be depicted by pictures. The WPTT can also test combinations of words. Moreover, the WPTT can be used in a classroom setting because individual testing is not required. Using Messick’s 1989 framework, we investigated whether the WPTT is an appropriate measure of the construct of written lexical retrieval. In a multiple regression approach we examined the relationship between the WPTT and another test of the same construct, a written Picture Naming task. In addition, we looked at the relationship with other related constructs such as lexical access and orthographic encoding. Results suggest that the WPTT is both a reliable and valid measure of written lexical retrieval. When corrected for typing speed, the WPTT is related to the Picture Naming task and Orthographic Encoding. Finally, the results show that the relationship between the WPTT and the Lexical Decision Task is not very strong. This study makes clear that Lexical Decision Tasks do not constitute a valid substitute for measuring written lexical retrieval. At the same time it underlines the advantages of using a test specifically developed for measuring speed of written lexical retrieval like the WPTT.

Language Testing, Vol. 21, No. 2, 174-201 (2004)
DOI: 10.1191/0265532204lt276oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?