This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Davies, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Three heresies of language testing research

University of Edinburgh, a1adavie{at}staffmail.ed.ac.uk

This article gives a personal view of the history of Anglo-American language testing over the last half-century. It argues that major developments in the field have tended to be embraced too enthusiastically, so that they have led to unbalanced views (or ‘heresies’) concerning the construct definition of language, the scope of test impact and the value of new methods of test delivery and analysis. The article considers in turn the move to integrative and then communicative testing in the 1970s and 1980s; the recent concerns about washback, impact, ethics and politics in language testing; and the effects of innovations such as item response theory and computer-based testing. Despite their unsettling in‘ uence, heresies should be welcomed for the challenge they pose to established theory and practice.

Language Testing, Vol. 20, No. 4, 355-368 (2003)
DOI: 10.1191/0265532203lt263oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?