Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Language Testing
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jafarpur, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Is the test constructor a facet?

Abdoljavad Jafarpur

Shiraz University, Iran, ajafarpur{at}rose.shirazu.ac.ir

Most modern language testers believe that the writing of a successful instrument begins with specifications, and that instruments constructed devoid of specifications are likely to go astray. The purpose of this study was to explore the relative impact of the test-developer on the performance of test-takers using multiple-choice reading comprehension tests that had no specifications. Traditional reading comprehension tests often consist of short prose passages followed by sets of multiple-choicecomprehension questions. The test constructor formulates the stem and the choices on the basis of his or her own renditions of the passage. The test-takers provide evidence of their comprehension in terms of their written responses to the items designed by the test constructor. Since the characteristics of the test method limit the responses the testees can provide, the expected response becomes part of the test method. Accordingly, it seems reasonable to suggest that there may be a facet associated with the test-developer.Six passages each with 3 different sets of multiple-choice items constructed by 3 (groups of) individuals were trialled on 335 Iranian EFL (English as a foreign language) learners. The results revealed differential performance on almost all sets, suggesting a test constructor effect.

Language Testing, Vol. 20, No. 1, 57-87 (2003)
DOI: 10.1191/0265532203lt244oa
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?