This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Alderson, J. C. Articles by Urquhart, A.H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The effect of students' academic discipline on their performance on ESP reading tests

University of Lancaster

A.H. Urquhart

College of St Mark and St John, Plymouth

This paper briefly reviews two earlier studies of the effect of student background knowledge on reading comprehension, then goes on to report a third study into the same effect. The paper draws the conclusion that the test results obtained in the study can be accounted for in terms of an interaction between background knowledge and linguistic proficiency. The paper closes with some observations on the broad concepts 'linguistic proficiency' and 'background knowledge'.

Language Testing, Vol. 2, No. 2, 192-204 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/026553228500200207


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Krekeler Language for special academic purposes (LSAP) testing: the effect of background knowledge revisited Language Testing, January 1, 2006; 23(1): 99 - 130. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. W. Stansfield Test translation and adaptation in public education in the USA Language Testing, April 1, 2003; 20(2): 189 - 207. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Jafarpur Is the test constructor a facet? Language Testing, January 1, 2003; 20(1): 57 - 87. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Ansary and E. Baba Topic Variable in Narrow-Scope Eap Short-Context Reading Tests RELC Journal, June 1, 2002; 33(1): 55 - 74. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Kobayashi Method effects on reading comprehension test performance: text organization and response format Language Testing, April 1, 2002; 19(2): 193 - 220. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Davies The logic of testing Languages for Specific Purposes Language Testing, April 1, 2001; 18(2): 133 - 147. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. F. Bachman Modern language testing at the turn of the century: assuring that what we count counts Language Testing, January 1, 2000; 17(1): 1 - 42. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. E. Ryan and L. F. Bachman Differential item functioning on two tests of EFL proficiency Language Testing, June 1, 1992; 9(1): 12 - 29. [PDF]

				C. A. Chapelle and R. G. Abraham Cloze method: what difference does it make? Language Testing, December 1, 1990; 7(2): 121 - 146. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. A. Hale Student major field and text content: interactive effects on reading comprehension in the Test of English as a Foreign Language Language Testing, June 1, 1988; 5(1): 49 - 61. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Chapelle Field independence : a source of language test variance? Language Testing, June 1, 1988; 5(1): 62 - 82. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Jafarpur The short-context technique: an alternative for testing reading comprehension Language Testing, December 1, 1987; 4(2): 195 - 220. [Abstract] [PDF]