|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Linguistic and cultural bias in language proficiency tests
Zheng Chen
University of California, Los Angeles
Grant Henning
University of California, Los Angeles
The extent to which language proficiency/placement tests may be biased for or against examinees from particular language or cultural groups has never to our knowledge been the focus of empirical research. The purpose of the present study has been to examine the English as a Second Language Placement Examination (ESLPE) employed at the University of California, to determine the nature, direction and extent of bias present for members of two linguistically and culturally diverse subgroups of the sample of examinees. By comparison of the response patterns of 34 native speakers of Spanish and 77 native speakers of Chinese from among a total sample of 312 students tested with one form of the test, it was possible to identify test items exhibiting bias in their respective skill domains. Included is a discussion of the nature, direction, extent and implications of the bias detected.
Language Testing, Vol. 2, No. 2,
155-163 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/026553228500200204
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
M. L. Abbott
A confirmatory approach to differential item functioning on an ESL reading assessment
Language Testing,
January 1, 2007;
24(1):
7 - 36.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T.-I. Pae and G.-P. Park
Examining the relationship between differential item functioning and differential test functioning
Language Testing,
October 1, 2006;
23(4):
475 - 496.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Uiterwijk and T. Vallen
Linguistic sources of item bias for second generation immigrants in Dutch tests
Language Testing,
April 1, 2005;
22(2):
211 - 234.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. B. Green and C. J. Weir
Can placement tests inform instructional decisions?
Language Testing,
October 1, 2004;
21(4):
467 - 494.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T.-I. Pae
DIF for examinees with different academic backgrounds
Language Testing,
January 1, 2004;
21(1):
53 - 73.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Kim
Detecting DIF across the different language groups in a speaking test
Language Testing,
January 1, 2001;
18(1):
89 - 114.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. D. Brown
The relative importance of persons, items, subtests and languages to TOEFL test variance
Language Testing,
April 1, 1999;
16(2):
217 - 238.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Elder
What does test bias have to do with fairness?
Language Testing,
November 1, 1997;
14(3):
261 - 277.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. John Kunnan
Modelling relationships among some test-taker characteristics and performance on EFL tests: an approach to construct validation
Language Testing,
November 1, 1994;
11(3):
225 - 250.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I.-C. Choi and L. F. Bachman
An investigation into the adequacy of three IRT models for data from two EFL reading tests
Language Testing,
June 1, 1992;
9(1):
51 - 78.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Sasaki
A comparison of two methods for detecting differential I item functioning in an ESL placement test
Language Testing,
December 1, 1991;
8(2):
95 - 111.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. F. Bachman, A. Kunnan Swathi Vanniaraian, and B. Lynch
Task and ability analysis as a basis for examining content and construct comparability in two EFL proficiency test batteries
Language Testing,
December 1, 1988;
5(2):
128 - 159.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Chapelle
Field independence : a source of language test variance?
Language Testing,
June 1, 1988;
5(1):
62 - 82.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Jafarpur
The short-context technique: an alternative for testing reading comprehension
Language Testing,
December 1, 1987;
4(2):
195 - 220.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. J. Adams, P. E. Griffin, and L. Martin
A latent trait method for measuring a dimension in second language proficiency
Language Testing,
June 1, 1987;
4(1):
9 - 27.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Spurling
Questioning the use of the Bejar method to determine unidimensionality
Language Testing,
June 1, 1987;
4(1):
93 - 95.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is the Bejar test of unidimensionality appropriate? A response to Spurling
Language Testing,
June 1, 1987;
4(1):
96 - 98.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
