Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Language Testing
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mislevy, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Almond, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Design and analysis in task-based language assessment

Robert J. Mislevy

University of Maryland, rm257{at}umail.umd.edu

Linda S. Steinberg

Educational Testing Service

Russell G. Almond

Educational Testing Service

In task-based language assessment (TBLA) language use is observed in settings that are more realistic and complex than in discrete skills assessments, and which typically require the integration of topical, social and/or pragmatic knowledge along with knowledge of the formal elements of language. But designing an assessment is not accomplished simply by determining the settings in which performance will be observed. TBLA raises questions of just how to design complex tasks, evaluate students’ performances and draw valid conclusions therefrom. This article examines these challenges from the perspective of ‘evidence-centred assessment design’. The main building blocks are student, evidence and task models, with tasks to be administered in accordance with an assembly model. We describe these models, show how they are linked and assembled to frame an assessment argument and illustrate points with examples from task-based language assessment.

Language Testing, Vol. 19, No. 4, 477-496 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0265532202lt241oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Language TestingHome page
C. J. Weir and J. R.W. Wu
Establishing test form and individual task comparability: a case study of a semi-direct speaking test
Language Testing, April 1, 2006; 23(2): 167 - 197.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language TestingHome page
T. McNamara
Book Review: Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Language testing in practice: designing and developing useful language tests
Language Testing, October 1, 2003; 20(4): 466 - 473.
[PDF]