Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Language Testing
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brindley, G.
Right arrow Articles by Slatyer, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Exploring task difficulty in ESL listening assessment

Geoff Brindley

Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia, gbrindley{at}ling.mq.edu.au

Helen Slatyer

Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia

This article reports on an exploratory study that investigated the comparability of listening assessment tasks used to assess and report learning outcomes of adult ESL learners in Australia. The study focused on the effects of task characteristics and task conditions on learners’ performance in competency-based listening assessment tasks that require learners to demonstrate specific listening behaviours. Key variables investigated included the nature of the input and the response mode. Quantitative and qualitative analyses of test scores suggest that speech rate and item format influence task and item difficulty. However, the complexity of the interaction between text, item and response makes it difficult to isolate the effects of specific variables. Implications of these findings for assessment task validity and reliability are considered and practical consequences for assessment task design in outcomes-based systems are discussed.

Language Testing, Vol. 19, No. 4, 369-394 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0265532202lt236oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Adult Education QuarterlyHome page
J. Mathews-Aydinli
Overlooked and Understudied? A Survey of Current Trends in Research on Adult English Language Learners
Adult Education Quarterly, May 1, 2008; 58(3): 198 - 213.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Business Communication QuarterlyHome page
R. T. Peterson
An Exploratory Study of Listening Practice Relative to Memory Testing and Lecture in Business Administration Courses
Business Communication Quarterly, September 1, 2007; 70(3): 285 - 300.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language TestingHome page
T. Lumley and B. O'Sullivan
The effect of test-taker gender, audience and topic on task performance in tape-mediated assessment of speaking
Language Testing, October 1, 2005; 22(4): 415 - 437.
[Abstract] [PDF]