This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Malvern, D. Articles by Richards, B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Investigating accommodation in language proficiency interviews using a new measure of lexical diversity

The University of Reading

Brian Richards

The University of Reading, b.j.richards{at}reading.ac.uk

Lexical diversity is an important indicator of language learners’ active vocabulary and how it is deployed. Traditionally it has been measured by the Type-Token Ratio (TTR), the ratio of different words to total words used. Unfortunately, TTR is a function of sample size: larger samples of words will give a lower TTR and even commonly used measures derived from TTR which are claimed to be independent of sample size are problematic. To overcome this, the authors have developed an innovative measure of vocabulary diversity, D, based on mathematically modelling how new words are introduced into larger and larger language samples, and have produced software (vocd) to calculate it.

Previous research by the authors into language proficiency interviews (Richards and Malvern, 2000) investigated linguistic and discourse accommodation of teacher-testers using a wide range of student and teacher variables. In a study of teenage learners of French, the aspect of teachers’ language in oral interviews that was most responsive to the ability of their students was lexical diversity. The analysis reported here focuses on this finding in greater depth using the new measure, D. The relationship between D and other measures of foreign language proficiency is investigated, the Ds of students and teachers are compared and the correlations between teachers’ D and students’ proficiency are computed.

Results firstly demonstrate the validity of D as a measure of vocabulary diversity and the effectiveness of vocd as a tool to analyse language data. Secondly, with regard to accommodation processes in oral testing, the two teachers did not finely tune their vocabulary diversity to the proficiency of individual students. Instead, each teacher roughly adjusted his or her language to the ability of the class they examined.

Language Testing, Vol. 19, No. 1, 85-104 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0265532202lt221oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Wigglesworth and N. Storch Pair versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy Language Testing, July 1, 2009; 26(3): 445 - 466. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Yu Lexical Diversity in Writing and Speaking Task Performances Applied Linguistics, June 4, 2009; (2009) amp024v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Sun Hee Ok Kim and D. Starks The role of emotions in L1 attrition: The case of Korean-English late bilinguals in New Zealand International Journal of Bilingualism, December 1, 2008; 12(4): 303 - 319. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. S. DeThorne, S. A. Petrill, S. A. Hart, R. W. Channell, R. J. Campbell, K. Deater-Deckard, L. A. Thompson, and D. J. Vandenbergh Genetic Effects on Children's Conversational Language Use J Speech Lang Hear Res, April 1, 2008; 51(2): 423 - 435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. S. DeThorne and R. W. Channell Clinician-Child Interactions: Adjustments in Linguistic Complexity Am J Speech Lang Pathol, May 1, 2007; 16(2): 119 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Halleck Symposium article: Data generation through role-play: Assessing oral proficiency Simulation Gaming, March 1, 2007; 38(1): 91 - 106. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. He and Y. Dai A corpus-based investigation into the validity of the CET-SET group discussion Language Testing, July 1, 2006; 23(3): 370 - 401. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. M. Guiberson, K. C. Barrett, E. G. Jancosek, and C. Yoshinaga Itano Language Maintenance and Loss in Preschool-Age Children of Mexican Immigrants: Longitudinal Study Communication Disorders Quarterly, January 1, 2006; 28(1): 4 - 17. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. Myles Interlanguage corpora and second language acquisition research Second Language Research, October 1, 2005; 21(4): 373 - 391. [Abstract] [PDF]