This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Jarvis, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Short texts, best-fitting curves and new measures of lexical diversity

Ohio University, jarvis{at}ohio.edu

Following up on recent work by Malvern and Richards (1997, this issue; McKee et al., 2000) concerning the measurement of lexical diversity through curve fitting, the present study compares the accuracy of five formulae in terms of their ability to model the type-token curves of written texts produced by learners and native speakers. The most accurate models are then used to consider unresolved issues that have been at the forefront of past research on lexical diversity: the relationship between lexical diversity and age, second language (L2) instruction, L2 proficiency, first language (L1) background, writing quality and vocabulary knowledge. The participants in the study comprise 140 Finnish-speaking and 70 Swedish-speakinglearners of English, and an additional group of 66 native English speakers. The data include written narrative descriptions of a silent film, and the results show that two of the curve-fitting formulae provide accurate models of the type-token curves of over 90% of the texts. The texts for which accurate models were obtained were subjected to further analyses, and the results indicate a clear relationship between lexical diversity and amount of instruction, but a more complicated relationship between lexical diversity and L1 background, writing quality and vocabulary knowledge.

Language Testing, Vol. 19, No. 1, 57-84 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0265532202lt220oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y.-W. Lee, C. Gentile, and R. Kantor Toward Automated Multi-trait Scoring of Essays: Investigating Links among Holistic, Analytic, and Text Feature Scores Applied Linguistics, November 24, 2009; (2009) amp040v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Yu Lexical Diversity in Writing and Speaking Task Performances Applied Linguistics, June 4, 2009; (2009) amp024v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Coleman, N. Gregg, L. McLain, and L. W. Bellair A Comparison of Spelling Performance Across Young Adults With and Without Dyslexia Assessment for Effective Intervention, March 1, 2009; 34(2): 94 - 105. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. M. McCarthy and S. Jarvis vocd: A theoretical and empirical evaluation Language Testing, October 1, 2007; 24(4): 459 - 488. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Gregg, C. Coleman, M. Davis, and J. C. Chalk Timed Essay Writing: Implications for High-Stakes Tests J Learn Disabil, August 1, 2007; 40(4): 306 - 318. [Abstract] [PDF]