This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Brindley, G. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Outcomes-based assessment in practice: some examples and emerging insights

Macquarie University, gbrindle{at}laurel.ocs.mq.edu.au

The implementation of outcomes-based assessment and reporting systems in educational programs has been accompanied by a range of political and technical problems, including tensions between the summative and formative purposes of assessment and doubts surrounding the validity and reliability of teacher-constructed assessment tasks. This article examines ways in which these problems have been manifested and addressed, using two recent examples from school and adult immigrant education in Australia. The first example concerns a recent controversy surrounding the use of national literacy benchmarks for primary school learners. Analysis of the issues suggests that some learner groups may be disadvantaged by the practice of reporting aggregate outcomes in terms of minimum standards, but that government policy is unlikely to change as long as the accountability function of assessment remains paramount in the public eye. The second example discusses the teacher-developed assessment tasks that are used to assess the achievement of language competencies in the Australian Adult Migrant English Program (AMEP). It is argued that problems of consistency and comparability that have been identified by research can be addressed through the development of fully-piloted task banks and the provision of appropriate forms of professional development. Greater attention needs to be given to the role of the teacher if outcomes-based assessments are to provide high quality information.

Language Testing, Vol. 18, No. 4, 393-407 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/026553220101800405


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. Littlewood Process-oriented pedagogy: facilitation, empowerment, or control? ELT J, July 1, 2009; 63(3): 246 - 254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Inbar-Lourie Constructing a language assessment knowledge base: A focus on language assessment courses Language Testing, July 1, 2008; 25(3): 385 - 402. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Llosa Validating a standards-based classroom assessment of English proficiency: A multitrait-multimethod approach Language Testing, October 1, 2007; 24(4): 489 - 515. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Rea-Dickins Understanding teachers as agents of assessment Language Testing, July 1, 2004; 21(3): 249 - 258. [PDF]

				C. Davison The contradictory culture of teacher-based assessment: ESL teacher assessment practices in Australian and Hong Kong secondary schools Language Testing, July 1, 2004; 21(3): 305 - 334. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. McNamara Book Review: Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Language testing in practice: designing and developing useful language tests Language Testing, October 1, 2003; 20(4): 466 - 473. [PDF]