This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by McNamara, T. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Language assessment as social practice: challenges for research

The University of Melbourne, tfmcna{at}unimelb.edu.au

In this article I argue that a growing awareness of the fundamentally social character of language assessment challenges us to rethink our priorities and responsibilities in language testing research. This awareness has been brought about by the treatment of the social character of educational assessment in Samuel Messick’s influential work on validity, and by the intellectual changes triggered by postmodernism, where models of individual consciousness have been reinterpreted in the light of socially motivated critiques. The article concludes by arguing that the institutional character of assessment often means that the needs of learners are not well served by much language assessment theory and practice, and calls for a reexamination of our research priorities.

Language Testing, Vol. 18, No. 4, 333-349 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/026553220101800402


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. M. Ducasse and A. Brown Assessing paired orals: Raters' orientation to interaction Language Testing, July 1, 2009; 26(3): 423 - 443. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. C. Bunch and D. Panayotova Latinos, Language Minority Students, and the Construction of ESL: Language Testing and Placement From High School to Community College Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, January 1, 2008; 7(1): 6 - 30. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Sasaki The 150-year history of English language assessment in Japanese education Language Testing, January 1, 2008; 25(1): 63 - 83. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Llosa Validating a standards-based classroom assessment of English proficiency: A multitrait-multimethod approach Language Testing, October 1, 2007; 24(4): 489 - 515. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Guoxing Yu Students' voices in the evaluation of their written summaries: Empowerment and democracy for test takers? Language Testing, October 1, 2007; 24(4): 539 - 572. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Huhta, P. Kalaja, and A. Pitkanen-Huhta Discursive construction of a high-stakes test: the many faces of a test-taker Language Testing, July 1, 2006; 23(3): 326 - 350. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Rea-Dickins Understanding teachers as agents of assessment Language Testing, July 1, 2004; 21(3): 249 - 258. [PDF]

				P. Edelenbos and A. Kubanek-German Teacher assessment: the concept of 'diagnostic competence' Language Testing, July 1, 2004; 21(3): 259 - 283. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Leung and B. Mohan Teacher formative assessment and talk in classroom contexts: assessment as discourse and assessment of discourse Language Testing, July 1, 2004; 21(3): 335 - 359. [Abstract] [PDF]