Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Language Testing
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oller, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Choe, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Testing verbal (language) and non-verbal abilities in language minorities: a socio-educational problem in historical perspective

John W. Oller, Jr.

University of Louisiana at Lafayette, joller{at}louisiana.edu

Kunok Kim

Chung-Ang University, Seoul

Yongjae Choe

Dongguk University, Seoul

There is a wide-spread socio-educational problem with language testing at its heart: Speakers of minority languages are over-represented in classes for the learning disabled, disordered and educable mentally retarded and under-represented in classes for the gifted. This imbalance is owed to mental measurement practices that involve language tests both directly and indirectly. The source of the problem is a general failure to appreciate the role of language proficiencies in psychological and educational testing. Also the relation between acquired (socially dependent) language proficiencies and so-called non-verbal abilities may be closer than commonly supposed. Among the questions addressed are the following: To what extent is it possible to measure non-verbal abilities without invoking acquired language/dialect proficiencies? Is it possible to get the instructions to non-verbal tasks across to test takers without recourse to one or more particular languages or dialects? Is it possible to make linguistically and culturally unbiased judgements about intellectual abilities (including abnormalities, disorders and giftedness) on the basis of ‘non-verbal’ tasks?

Language Testing, Vol. 17, No. 3, 341-360 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/026553220001700304
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Clin Nurs ResHome page
K. M. Nokes and P. C. Nwakeze
Assessing Cognitive Capacity for Participation in a Research Study
Clin Nurs Res, November 1, 2007; 16(4): 336 - 349.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Language TestingHome page
J. W. Oller Jr, K. Kim, Y. Choe, and L. H. Jarvis
Testing relations between language (verbal) and nonverbal abilities in children and adults acquiring a nonprimary language
Language Testing, January 1, 2001; 18(1): 33 - 54.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Language TestingHome page
J. W. Oller Jr., K. Kim, and Y. Choe
Applying general sign theory to testing language (verbal) and nonverbal abilities
Language Testing, October 1, 2000; 17(4): 377 - 396.
[Abstract] [PDF]