Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Language Testing
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takala, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kaftandjieva, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Test fairness: a DIF analysis of an L2 vocabulary test

Sauli Takala

University of Jyväskylä, Finland, sjtakala{at}cc.jyu.fi

Felianka Kaftandjieva

University of Jyväskylä, Finland

The purpose of this study is to analyse gender-uniform differential item functioning (DIF) in a second language (L2) vocabulary test with the tools of item response theory (the separate calibration t-method) and to study potential gender impact on the test performance measured by different item composites.

The results of the study show that despite the fact that there are test items with indications of DIF in favour of either females or males, the test as a whole is not gender-biased. In spite of this, it was demonstrated that some item composites are gender-biased. In view of item bank building and use, it means that some of the tests constructed on the basis of an item bank might be biased if the item bank contains items with indication for DIF. Although the results of some empirical research suggest that the requirements for items with DIF to be excluded from the final test version may on the whole be too restrictive, this study demonstrated that the traditional advice of excluding biased items gains new significance in the light of item bank building and use since doing so will prevent possible biased item composites.

Language Testing, Vol. 17, No. 3, 323-340 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/026553220001700303


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Topics in Early Childhood Special EducationHome page
C. Huaqing Qi and S. C. Marley
Differential Item Functioning Analysis of the Preschool Language Scale--4 Between English-Speaking Hispanic and European American Children From Low-Income Families
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, November 1, 2009; 29(3): 171 - 180.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language TestingHome page
T.-I. Pae and G.-P. Park
Examining the relationship between differential item functioning and differential test functioning
Language Testing, October 1, 2006; 23(4): 475 - 496.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language TestingHome page
H. Uiterwijk and T. Vallen
Linguistic sources of item bias for second generation immigrants in Dutch tests
Language Testing, April 1, 2005; 22(2): 211 - 234.
[Abstract] [PDF]