Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Language Testing
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McKay, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

On ESL standards for school-age learners

Penny McKay

Queensland University of Technology, Australia, pa.mckay{at}qut.edu.au

The recent introduction of literacy benchmarks and assessment regimes in schools which are designed for students with an English-speaking background but which are also used to assess the second language and literacy progress of ESL1 learners has repercussions for teaching and learning, on professional understandings and on ESL learner self-efficacy. Insights into how to map and monitor ESL language development within the mainstream context have been gained through the development of a number of ESL standards for schools. This article presents principles behind the construction of ESL standards for schools, drawing on examples of ESL standards developed in Australia, England and Wales, and the United States, and examines how differences in purpose in these standards - planning, professional understanding, and reporting - influence how ESL standards might best be constructed. It raises issues of consequential validity which arise in the construction and use of valid ESL standards. Arguments supporting the need for ESL standards in the current climate of English-speaking background-based assessment for all are put forward through a close analysis and understanding of the construction and impact of different types of ESL standards.

Language Testing, Vol. 17, No. 2, 185-214 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/026553220001700205


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Language TestingHome page
S. Arkoudis and K. O'Loughlin
Tensions between validity and outcomes: teacher assessment of written work of recently arrived immigrant ESL students
Language Testing, July 1, 2004; 21(3): 284 - 304.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language TestingHome page
C. Scott and S. Erduran
Learning from international frameworks for assessment: EAL descriptors in Australia and the USA
Language Testing, July 1, 2004; 21(3): 409 - 431.
[PDF]


Home page
Language TestingHome page
G. Brindley and H. Slatyer
Exploring task difficulty in ESL listening assessment
Language Testing, October 1, 2002; 19(4): 369 - 394.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language TestingHome page
G. Brindley
Outcomes-based assessment in practice: some examples and emerging insights
Language Testing, October 1, 2001; 18(4): 393 - 407.
[Abstract] [PDF]