This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Sasaki, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Effects of cultural schemata on students' test-taking processes for cloze tests: a multiple data source approach

Nagoya Gakuin University, Japan, f43689g{at}nucc.cc.nagoyau.ac.jp

The present study investigated how schemata activated by culturally familiar words might have influenced students’ cloze test-taking processes. Sixty Japanese EFL students were divided into two groups with equivalent English reading proficiency. They completed either a culturally familiar or an unfamiliar version of a cloze test. Partially replicating Chihara et al.’s (1989) experiment, several unfamiliar words in the original cloze test passage were changed to more familiar ones in the modified version. Unlike in Chihara et al. (1989), however, students were asked to give verbal reports of their test-taking processes, and to recall the passage after they had completed the tests. Thus, the two groups’ test-taking activities were compared in terms of:

1) item performance;

2) expressing correct understanding of the key terms while solving the items and recalling;

3) the amount of text information they used to complete the items; and

4) the quantities and qualities of the final recalls.

Results demonstrated that those who read the culturally familiar cloze text tried to solve more items and generally understood the text better, which resulted in better performances than those of the students who read the original text. These results also support the claim that cloze tests can measure higher-order processing abilities.

Language Testing, Vol. 17, No. 1, 85-114 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/026553220001700104


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. Kim and K. McDonough Learners' Production of Passives during Syntactic Priming Activities Applied Linguistics, March 1, 2008; 29(1): 149 - 154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Yamashita Processes of taking a gap-filling test: comparison of skilled and less skilled EFL readers Language Testing, July 1, 2003; 20(3): 267 - 293. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Jafarpur Is the test constructor a facet? Language Testing, January 1, 2003; 20(1): 57 - 87. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Douglas Performance consistency in second language acquisition and language testing research: a conceptual gap Second Language Research, October 1, 2001; 17(4): 442 - 456. [Abstract] [PDF]