This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bachman, L. F. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Modern language testing at the turn of the century: assuring that what we count counts

University of California, Los Angeles, bachman{at}humnet.ucla.edu

In the past twenty years, language testing research and practice have witnessed the refinement of a rich variety of approaches and tools for research and development, along with a broadening of philosophical perspectives and the kinds of research questions that are being investigated. While this research has deepened our understanding of the factors and processes that affect performance on language tests, as well as of the consequences and ethics of test use, it has also revealed lacunae in our knowledge, and pointed to new areas for research. This article reviews developments in language testing research and practice over the past twenty years, and suggests some future directions in the areas of professionalizing the field and validation research. It is argued that concerns for ethical conduct must be grounded in valid test use, so that professionalization and validation research are inseparable. Thus, the way forward lies in a strong programme of validation that includes considerations of ethical test use, both as a paradigm for research and as a practical procedure for quality control in the design, development and use of language tests.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Phakiti Construct validation of Bachman and Palmer's (1996) strategic competence model over time in EFL reading tests Language Testing, April 1, 2008; 25(2): 237 - 272. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Lund and P. M. Winke Book review: Brown, H. Douglas (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education. 324 pp. $48.00 paper. ISBN 0--13--098834--0; Brown, James Dean (2005). Testing in language programs: A comprehensive guide to English language assessment. New York: McGraw-Hill. 307 pp. $32.85 paper. ISBN 0--07--294836--1 Language Testing, April 1, 2008; 25(2): 273 - 282. [PDF]

				M. East Bilingual dictionaries in tests of L2 writing proficiency: do they make a difference? Language Testing, July 1, 2007; 24(3): 331 - 353. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Pino-Silva Student perceptions of computerized tests ELT J, January 29, 2007; (2007) ccl056v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Eckes and R. Grotjahn A closer look at the construct validity of C-tests Language Testing, July 1, 2006; 23(3): 290 - 325. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Trites and M. McGroarty Reading to learn and reading to integrate: new tasks for reading comprehension tests? Language Testing, April 1, 2005; 22(2): 174 - 210. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Cumming, L. Grant, P. Mulcahy-Ernt, and D. E. Powers A teacher-verification study of speaking and writing prototype tasks for a new TOEFL Language Testing, April 1, 2004; 21(2): 107 - 145. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Jafarpur Is the test constructor a facet? Language Testing, January 1, 2003; 20(1): 57 - 87. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. McNamara Language assessment as social practice: challenges for research Language Testing, October 1, 2001; 18(4): 333 - 349. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Brindley Outcomes-based assessment in practice: some examples and emerging insights Language Testing, October 1, 2001; 18(4): 393 - 407. [Abstract] [PDF]