Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Language Testing
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marquardt, T. P.
Right arrow Articles by Gillam, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Assessment in communication disorders: some observations on current issues

Thomas P. Marquardt

University of Texas, Austin, tmarq{at}mail.utexas.edu

Ronald B. Gillam

University of Texas, Austin

The assessment of communication disorders is, by necessity, a behavioural description process. Standardized measures provide quantitative data that contribute to the identification of communication disorders, but test scores and normative comparisons are insufficient for describing the effects of impairment on performance in communicative settings. The importance of ecological validity in tests for communication disorders, the need for systematic observation and the potential biases in testing diverse populations are considered within the framework of identification and differential diagnosis of speech and language disorders. There are also communicative disorders that are clinically recognized, but which cannot be reliably identified following standardized testing and systematic observation in communicative settings. For these disorders, there is a continuing need for research based on behavioural description to develop a theoretical understanding of the disorder that can guide reliable assessment, identification and intervention.

Language Testing, Vol. 16, No. 3, 249-269 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/026553229901600302


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Child Language Teaching and TherapyHome page
S. Worth and S. Reynolds
The assessment and identification of language impairment in Asperger's syndrome: A case study
Child Language Teaching and Therapy, February 1, 2008; 24(1): 55 - 71.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication Disorders QuarterlyHome page
J. Tilstra and K. McMaster
Productivity, Fluency, and Grammaticality Measures From Narratives: Potential Indicators of Language Proficiency?
Communication Disorders Quarterly, November 1, 2007; 29(1): 43 - 53.
[Abstract] [PDF]