This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Kormos, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Simulating conversations in oral-proficiency assessment: a conversation analysis of role plays and non-scripted interviews in language exams

Eötvös University, kormos{at}isis.elte.hu

Several recent studies have investigated the nature of interaction in oral proficiency exams and have concluded that the interview format obscures differences in the conversational competence of the candidates. The present paper examines what opportunities test takers have to display their knowledge of managing conversations in the L2 in two types of tasks: non-scripted interviews and guided role-play activities. The data for the study consists of 30 interviews and 30 role-play activities between near-native examiners and intermediate learners used in language exams in Hungary. The interviews and role-plays have been analysed for the number of topics introduced and ratified by the examiner and the candidate respectively, as well as for the number of interruptions, openings and closings produced by the examiner and the candidate. The findings show that the conversational interaction is more symmetrical in the guided role-play activity with the candidates introducing and ratifying approximately the same number of topics as the examiners. In addition, the examinees have the opportunity to interrupt and hold the floor more effectively during the role-play activity and can demonstrate their knowledge of how to open and close a conversation. These findings suggest that guided role-play activities used in the study exhibit several characteristics of real-life conversations and therefore can be used for assessing the candidates’ conversational competence.

Language Testing, Vol. 16, No. 2, 163-188 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/026553229901600203


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. M. Ducasse and A. Brown Assessing paired orals: Raters' orientation to interaction Language Testing, July 1, 2009; 26(3): 423 - 443. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. J. Ockey The effects of group members' personalities on a test taker's L2 group oral discussion test scores Language Testing, April 1, 2009; 26(2): 161 - 186. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. He and Y. Dai A corpus-based investigation into the validity of the CET-SET group discussion Language Testing, July 1, 2006; 23(3): 370 - 401. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. J. Bonk and G. J. Ockey A many-facet Rasch analysis of the second language group oral discussion task Language Testing, January 1, 2003; 20(1): 89 - 110. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. O'Sullivan, C. J. Weir, and N. Saville Using observation checklists to validate speaking-test tasks Language Testing, January 1, 2002; 19(1): 33 - 56. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Salaberry Revising the revised format of the ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview Language Testing, July 1, 2000; 17(3): 289 - 310. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. F. Bachman Modern language testing at the turn of the century: assuring that what we count counts Language Testing, January 1, 2000; 17(1): 1 - 42. [Abstract] [PDF]