Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Language Testing
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laufer, B.
Right arrow Articles by Nation, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability

Batia Laufer

English Department, University of Haifa

Paul Nation

English Language Institute, Victoria University of Wellington, Paul.Nation{at}vuw.ac.nz

It is important in the design of the vocabulary component of a teaching program that teachers are able to discover the state of their learners’ vocabulary knowledge. It is also important that researchers can draw on a variety of vocabulary measures to investigate the nature of vocabulary growth. This study focuses on a controlled production measure of vocabulary consisting of items from five frequency levels, and using a completion item type like the following.

The garden was full of fra flowers.

The controlled-production vocabulary-levels test was found to be reliable, valid (in that the levels distinguished between different proficiency groups) and practical. There was a satisfactory degree of equivalence between two equivalent forms of the test.

Language Testing, Vol. 16, No. 1, 33-51 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/026553229901600103
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Applied LinguisticsHome page
D. Gardner
Validating the Construct of Word in Applied Corpus-based Vocabulary Research: A Critical Survey
Applied Linguistics, June 1, 2007; 28(2): 241 - 265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Applied LinguisticsHome page
B. Laufer
Lexical Frequency Profiles: From Monte Carlo to the Real World: A Response to Meara (2005)
Applied Linguistics, December 1, 2005; 26(4): 582 - 588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Language TestingHome page
B. Laufer, C. Elder, K. Hill, and P. Congdon
Size and strength: do we need both to measure vocabulary knowledge?
Language Testing, April 1, 2004; 21(2): 202 - 226.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Language TestingHome page
J. Read and C. A. Chapelle
A framework for second language vocabulary assessment
Language Testing, January 1, 2001; 18(1): 1 - 32.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Language TestingHome page
N. Schmitt, D. Schmitt, and C. Clapham
Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test
Language Testing, January 1, 2001; 18(1): 55 - 88.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Language TestingHome page
L. F. Bachman
Modern language testing at the turn of the century: assuring that what we count counts
Language Testing, January 1, 2000; 17(1): 1 - 42.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Language TestingHome page
A. Vermeer
Coming to grips with lexical richness in spontaneous speech data
Language Testing, January 1, 2000; 17(1): 65 - 83.
[Abstract] [PDF]