|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Scaling descriptors for language proficiency scales
Brian North
Eurocentres Foundation, Zürich, bnorth{at}eurocentres.com
Günther Schneider
Institut für deutsche Sprache, University of Fribourg
This paper reports results from a Swiss National Science Research Council project which aimed to develop a scale of language proficiency in the form of a ‘descriptor bank’. Up until now, most scales of language proficiency have been produced by appeal to intuition and to those scales which already exist rather than to theories of linguistic description or of measurement. The intention in this project was to use an item-banking methodology to develop a flexible scale of stand-alone criterion statements with known difficulty values.
The project took place in two rounds: the first for English (1994), the second for French, German and English (1995). In each year pools of descriptors were produced by analysing available proficiency scales. Through workshops with representative teachers, the descriptors were then refined into stand-alone criterion statements considered to be clear, useful and relevant to the sectors concerned. Selected descriptors presented on questionnaires were then used by participating teachers to assess the proficiency of learners in their classes. This data was used to scale the descriptors using the Rasch rating scale model. The difficulty estimates for the descriptors produced in relation to English in 1994 proved remarkably stable in relation to French, German and English in 1995.
Language Testing, Vol. 15, No. 2,
217-262 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/026553229801500204
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
A. M. Ducasse and A. Brown
Assessing paired orals: Raters' orientation to interaction
Language Testing,
July 1, 2009;
26(3):
423 - 443.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. Knoch
Diagnostic assessment of writing: A comparison of two rating scales
Language Testing,
April 1, 2009;
26(2):
275 - 304.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. David
Investigating the performance of alternative types of grammar items
Language Testing,
January 1, 2007;
24(1):
65 - 97.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Rimmer
Measuring grammatical complexity: the Gordian knot
Language Testing,
October 1, 2006;
23(4):
497 - 519.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Figueras, B. North, S. Takala, N. Verhelst, and P. Van Avermaet
Relating examinations to the Common European Framework: a manual
Language Testing,
July 1, 2005;
22(3):
261 - 279.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Brown
Book Review: Testing second language speaking
Language Testing,
April 1, 2005;
22(2):
235 - 241.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Edelenbos and A. Kubanek-German
Teacher assessment: the concept of 'diagnostic competence'
Language Testing,
July 1, 2004;
21(3):
259 - 283.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Cumming, L. Grant, P. Mulcahy-Ernt, and D. E. Powers
A teacher-verification study of speaking and writing prototype tasks for a new TOEFL
Language Testing,
April 1, 2004;
21(2):
107 - 145.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Lumley
Assessment criteria in a large-scale writing test: what do they really mean to the raters?
Language Testing,
July 1, 2002;
19(3):
246 - 276.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Brindley
Outcomes-based assessment in practice: some examples and emerging insights
Language Testing,
October 1, 2001;
18(4):
393 - 407.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. McKay
On ESL standards for school-age learners
Language Testing,
April 1, 2000;
17(2):
185 - 214.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
