Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Language Testing
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buck, G.
Right arrow Articles by Tatsuoka, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Application of the rule-space procedure to language testing: examining attributes of a free response listening test

Gary Buck

Educational Testing Service, gbuck{at}ets.org

Kikumi Tatsuoka

Educational Testing Service

This study uses the rule-space methodology to explore the cognitive and linguistic attributes that underlie performance on an open-ended, short-answer, listening comprehension test. This is the first application of the methodology to language testing. The rule-space methodology is an adaptation of statistical pattern recognition techniques applied to the problem of diagnosing the cognitive attributes (knowledge, skills, abilities, strategies, etc.) underlying test performance. The methodology provides diagnostic information about the individual test-takers on each of these attributes. Based on a literature search, attribute candidates were identified which seemed likely to explain performance on the listening test. Two rule-space analyses were carried out, and the final attribute list had 15 attributes, with 14 interactions. With this, 96% of the test-takers were successfully classified into their respective latent knowledge states, and given scores on each attribute. This result suggests that the rule-space methodology can be used to identify attributes underlying performance on language tests. The study also provided useful information about the listening construct.

Language Testing, Vol. 15, No. 2, 119-157 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/026553229801500201


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Language TestingHome page
E. E. Jang
Cognitive diagnostic assessment of L2 reading comprehension ability: Validity arguments for Fusion Model application to LanguEdge assessment
Language Testing, January 1, 2009; 26(1): 031 - 73.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language TestingHome page
M.-Y. Song
Do divisible subskills exist in second language (L2) comprehension? A structural equation modeling approach
Language Testing, October 1, 2008; 25(4): 435 - 464.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
K. K. Tatsuoka, J. E. Corter, and C. Tatsuoka
Patterns of Diagnosed Mathematical Content and Process Skills in TIMSS-R Across a Sample of 20 Countries
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 2004; 41(4): 901 - 926.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language TestingHome page
G. Brindley and H. Slatyer
Exploring task difficulty in ESL listening assessment
Language Testing, October 1, 2002; 19(4): 369 - 394.
[Abstract] [PDF]