Language Testing

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rea-Dickins, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Language Testing, Vol. 14, No. 3, 304-314 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/026553229701400307
© 1997 SAGE Publications

So, why do we need relationships with stakeholders in language testing? A view from the UK

Pauline Rea-Dickins

University of Warwick

Stakeholders are identified as those who make decisions and those who are affec ted by those decisions. Such a definition makes the range of possible stakes in assessment and testing very wide. These 'stakes' are categorized in terms of test research and development functions, curriculum innovation and implementation, and accountability functions. The article examines some of the contributions that stakeholders such as learners, teachers and parents have in the assessment process. It also examines the relationship between experts and government. Participation by stakeholders is not limited to providing a forum for stakeholders to express their views but it is also about equipping teachers, parents and others with infor mation so that they may take appropriate action. In this way a stakeholder approach to assessment has the effect of democratizing assessment processes, of improving relationships between those involved, and thereby of promoting greater fairness.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?