|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Washback, impact and validity: ethical concerns
Liz Hamp-Lyons
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
For many years it was asserted that language tests had a negative impact on teach ing and thereby on learning/learners. This impact has become widely known in language testing as 'washback' ('backwash'). A theory of washback is emerging and its domain being delineated; in this article the theory of washback is linked with the broader concept of 'impact' in educational measurement, and thence to the recent debate on construct validity associated with Messick.
Language Testing, Vol. 14, No. 3,
295-303 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/026553229701400306

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
I.-C. Choi
The impact of EFL testing on EFL education in Korea
Language Testing,
January 1, 2008;
25(1):
39 - 62.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Spratt
Washback and the classroom: the implications for teaching and learning of studies of washback from exams
Language Teaching Research,
January 1, 2005;
9(1):
5 - 29.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Shohamy
Democratic assessment as an alternative
Language Testing,
October 1, 2001;
18(4):
373 - 391.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Spolsky
Book Review: The big test: the secret history of the American meritocracy
Language Testing,
July 1, 2000;
17(3):
369 - 375.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. F. Bachman
Modern language testing at the turn of the century: assuring that what we count counts
Language Testing,
January 1, 2000;
17(1):
1 - 42.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|