Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Language Testing
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hawthorne, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The political dimension of English language testing in Australia

Lesleyanne Hawthorne

University of Melbourne

The past decade has coincided with the increasing use of English language testing in Australia for nonlinguistic purposes, frequently in contexts governed by signifi cant political pressures. This article explores two recent examples: the access: test (Australian Assessment of Communicative English Skills), a form of ESL testing designed actively to regulate the flow of skilled migrants to Australia; and the step test (Special Test of English Proficiency), a test ostensibly designed to assess linguistic competence, but in fact structured to play a central role in the determi nation of asylum seekers' residential status. This article explores the pragmatic considerations which can give rise to such test development. Its conclusion is that macropolitical pressures can have a profound impact on test design, administration and outcomes, and as such warrant detailed ethical consideration from applied lin guists.

Language Testing, Vol. 14, No. 3, 248-260 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/026553229701400303


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?