This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Spolsky, B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The ethics of gatekeeping tests: what have we learned in a hundred years?

Bar Ilan University

Tests have always been used as a means of political and social control. Critics have emphasized their unfairness and what Edgeworth called their 'unavoidable uncertainty'. Test results are unreliable, especially at the extremes, and their pre dictive power is weak. Language testers above all need to be sceptical; they should insist that the most complete information about candidates be made available for selection decision-making.

Language Testing, Vol. 14, No. 3, 242-247 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/026553229701400302


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. T. Simpson Western EFL Teachers and East-West Classroom-Culture Conflicts RELC Journal, December 1, 2008; 39(3): 381 - 394. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I.-C. Choi The impact of EFL testing on EFL education in Korea Language Testing, January 1, 2008; 25(1): 39 - 62. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. W. Stansfield Test translation and adaptation in public education in the USA Language Testing, April 1, 2003; 20(2): 189 - 207. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. F. Bachman Modern language testing at the turn of the century: assuring that what we count counts Language Testing, January 1, 2000; 17(1): 1 - 42. [Abstract] [PDF]