Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Language Testing
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davies, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Introduction

Introduction: the limits of ethics in language testing

Alan Davies

University of Edinburgh and University of Melbourne

The articles in this special issue were written for a symposium on the ethics of language testing held at the triennial congress of the Association Internationale de Linguistique Appliquée in August 1996 in Finland. This special issue addresses the role of ethics (and the limits of that role) in professional activities such as language testing. The nine articles that follow can be divided into four sections. The two articles in the first section (Spolsky and Hawthorne) consider language testing as a means of political control. The two in the second section (Elder, and Norton and Starfield) are concerned essentially with the definition of the test con struct — Elder considering whether the construct has the same meaning for differ ent groups and Norton and Starfield questioning whether it is form or content that is being assessed. The two articles in the third section (Hamp-Lyons and Rea- Dickins) consider the effects of language tests on the various stakeholders who are involved. In the fourth section, the three articles (Shohamy, Lynch and Davies) offer criteria for promoting ethicality in language testing, Lynch by an approach from principle (deontological), Davies through the professionalizing of the activity (teleological), and Shohamy through attention both to method and to consequence.

Language Testing, Vol. 14, No. 3, 235-241 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/026553229701400301
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Second Language ResearchHome page
M. Thomas
Review article: Ethical issues in the study of second language acquisition: resources for researchers
Second Language Research, October 1, 2009; 25(4): 493 - 511.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Language TestingHome page
H.-J. Lee
Book Review: Experimenting with uncertainty: essays in honour of Alan Davies
Language Testing, October 1, 2005; 22(4): 533 - 538.
[PDF]

Home page
 Language TestingHome page
K. Boyd and A. Davies
Doctors' orders for language testers: the origin and purpose of ethical codes
Language Testing, July 1, 2002; 19(3): 296 - 322.
[Abstract] [PDF]