Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Language Testing
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sherman, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reviews

The effect of question preview in listening comprehension tests

Jane Sherman

La Terza University of Rome

Previewed comprehension questions in listening tests pose questions of construct validity: how does this test method affect the test results? An examination of the construct of listening comprehension suggests that question preview may affect comprehension positively by focusing the attention or supplying information about the text, or negatively by interfering with subjective comprehension processes, increasing the burden on the attention or imposing shallower processing. Alterna tively it may have no significant effect. The quantitative effect on test results and the qualitative effect on recall were predicted for each possibility. In the study, 78 subjects took listening tests in four different versions, one with questions before, one with questions after, one with questions sandwiched between two hear ings and one with no questions. Subjects also completed questionnaires designed to elicit reactions to each version and, a week later, wrote a free recall of what they had heard. Results from the recall were inconclusive but in the tests the `sandwich' version produced significantly more correct answers. Questionnaire responses indicated that subjects felt the sandwich version facilitated comprehen sion most, but also showed a strong affective attachment to previewed questions. It is concluded that previewed questions seem more helpful than they really are.

Language Testing, Vol. 14, No. 2, 185-213 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/026553229701400204


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?