This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Shohamy, E. Articles by Ferman, I. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Test impact revisited: washback effect over time

Smadar Donitsa-Schmidt

Irit Ferman

Tel Aviv University

In countries with centralized educational systems national tests are used as primary devices through which changes in the educational system are introduced. This article examines the impact over time of two national tests which have been in operation for a number of years: one in Arabic as a second language (ASL) and one in English as a foreign language (EFL) through questionnaires, interviews and document analysis from a sample of teachers, students and language inspectors. Results showed different washback patterns for the two tests. Slight modifications in the ASL test created no effect in classroom activities, test preparation, or the status and prestige of the subject tested, yet, the inspectors expressed satisfaction and wished to continue the administration of the test as they feared that without the tests proficiency levels would drop. Slight modifications in the EFL test, on the other hand, created major impact in terms of teaching activities, time devoted for test preparation, production of new teaching material, etc. Although negative attitudes were expressed by teachers regarding the quality of the test, they would like it to continue. Inspectors believe that the test creates a meaningful change and is powerful enough to trigger changes without a need to provide training and a new curriculum. The study shows that washback varies over time, owing to many factors such as the status of the language and the uses of the test.

Language Testing, Vol. 13, No. 3, 298-317 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/026553229601300305


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Gan Zhengdong IELTS Preparation Course and Student IELTS Performance: A Case Study in Hong Kong RELC Journal, April 1, 2009; 40(1): 23 - 41. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Nkosana Attitudinal obstacles to curriculum and assessment reform Language Teaching Research, April 1, 2008; 12(2): 287 - 312. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Huhta, P. Kalaja, and A. Pitkanen-Huhta Discursive construction of a high-stakes test: the many faces of a test-taker Language Testing, July 1, 2006; 23(3): 326 - 350. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Saif Aiming for positive washback: a case study of international teaching assistants Language Testing, January 1, 2006; 23(1): 1 - 34. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Spratt Washback and the classroom: the implications for teaching and learning of studies of washback from exams Language Teaching Research, January 1, 2005; 9(1): 5 - 29. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Rea-Dickins Understanding teachers as agents of assessment Language Testing, July 1, 2004; 21(3): 249 - 258. [PDF]

				B. K. Lynch In search of the ethical test Language Testing, November 1, 1997; 14(3): 315 - 327. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Shohamy Testing methods, testing consequences: are they ethical? are they fair? Language Testing, November 1, 1997; 14(3): 340 - 349. [Abstract] [PDF]