This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Messick, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Validity and washback in language testing

Washback, a concept prominent in applied linguistics, refers to the extent to which the introduction and use of a test influences language teachers and learners to do things they would not otherwise do that promote or inhibit language learning. Some proponents have even maintained that a test's validity should be appraised by the degree to which it manifests positive or negative washback, a notion akin to the proposal of 'systemic validity' in the educational measurement literature. This article examines the concept of washback as an instance of the consequential aspect of construct validity, linking positive washback to so-called authentic and direct assessments and, more basically, to the need to minimize construct under- representation and construct-irrelevant difficulty in the test.

Language Testing, Vol. 13, No. 3, 241-256 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/026553229601300302


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Gebril Score generalizability of academic writing tasks: Does one test method fit it all? Language Testing, October 1, 2009; 26(4): 507 - 531. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. M. Ducasse and A. Brown Assessing paired orals: Raters' orientation to interaction Language Testing, July 1, 2009; 26(3): 423 - 443. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Nkosana Attitudinal obstacles to curriculum and assessment reform Language Teaching Research, April 1, 2008; 12(2): 287 - 312. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I.-C. Choi The impact of EFL testing on EFL education in Korea Language Testing, January 1, 2008; 25(1): 39 - 62. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. East Bilingual dictionaries in tests of L2 writing proficiency: do they make a difference? Language Testing, July 1, 2007; 24(3): 331 - 353. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. R. Freiermuth Symposium article: ESP needs washback and the fine tuning of driving instruction Simulation Gaming, March 1, 2007; 38(1): 35 - 47. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. David Investigating the performance of alternative types of grammar items Language Testing, January 1, 2007; 24(1): 65 - 97. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Van Moere Validity evidence in a university group oral test Language Testing, October 1, 2006; 23(4): 411 - 440. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Roever Validation of a web-based test of ESL pragmalinguistics Language Testing, April 1, 2006; 23(2): 229 - 256. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Saif Aiming for positive washback: a case study of international teaching assistants Language Testing, January 1, 2006; 23(1): 1 - 34. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. V. Dastjerdi and M. R. Talebinezhad Chain-preserving deletion procedure in cloze: a discoursal perspective Language Testing, January 1, 2006; 23(1): 58 - 72. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Green Book Review: Washback in language testing: research contexts and methods Language Testing, October 1, 2005; 22(4): 539 - 545. [PDF]

				Q. Luxia Stakeholders' conflicting aims undermine the washback function of a high-stakes test Language Testing, April 1, 2005; 22(2): 142 - 173. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Spratt Washback and the classroom: the implications for teaching and learning of studies of washback from exams Language Teaching Research, January 1, 2005; 9(1): 5 - 29. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Phakiti A closer look at the relationship of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use to EFL reading achievement test performance Language Testing, January 1, 2003; 20(1): 26 - 56. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Ansary and E. Baba Topic Variable in Narrow-Scope Eap Short-Context Reading Tests RELC Journal, June 1, 2002; 33(1): 55 - 74. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Davies The logic of testing Languages for Specific Purposes Language Testing, April 1, 2001; 18(2): 133 - 147. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Read and C. A. Chapelle A framework for second language vocabulary assessment Language Testing, January 1, 2001; 18(1): 1 - 32. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. M. Norris Book Review: Language testing in practice: designing and developing useful language tests Language Teaching Research, January 1, 1999; 3(1): 75 - 78. [PDF]

				L. Hamp-Lyons Washback, impact and validity: ethical concerns Language Testing, November 1, 1997; 14(3): 295 - 303. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. K. Lynch In search of the ethical test Language Testing, November 1, 1997; 14(3): 315 - 327. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. M. Bailey Working for washback: a review of the washback concept in language testing Language Testing, November 1, 1996; 13(3): 257 - 279. [Abstract] [PDF]