This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Riley, G. L. Articles by Lee, J. F. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A comparison of recall and summary protocols as measures of second language reading comprehension

Syracuse University

James F. Lee

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of test method on the reading performance of two levels of early-stage L2 readers of French. L2 reading research examining test methods has focused primarily on discrete- point modes of response. This study compared two global response modes, the summary and the recall protocol. Half of the 80 subjects were asked to read a passage and to write a summary of the passage and the other half were asked to read the passage and to recall it. The written protocols were analysed for total number of idea units as well as the number of main ideas, supporting ideas and details. The total number of idea units was submitted to a two-way analysis of variance. The three levels of idea units were submitted to separate two-way analyses of variance. Results indicate a significant qualitative difference in the performance on the two tasks. The summaries contained significantly more main ideas than the recall protocols. Fur thermore, the summaries contained a higher percentage of main ideas than details whereas the recall protocols contained a higher percentage of details than main ideas. The results have research and pedagogical implications.

Language Testing, Vol. 13, No. 2, 173-189 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/026553229601300203


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Guoxing Yu Reading to summarize in English and Chinese: A tale of two languages? Language Testing, October 1, 2008; 25(4): 521 - 551. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Guoxing Yu Students' voices in the evaluation of their written summaries: Empowerment and democracy for test takers? Language Testing, October 1, 2007; 24(4): 539 - 572. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Liying Cheng, D. A. Klinger, and Ying Zheng The challenges of the Ontario Secondary School Literacy Test for second language students Language Testing, April 1, 2007; 24(2): 185 - 208. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Y.-F. Chang On the use of the immediate recall task as a measure of second language reading comprehension Language Testing, October 1, 2006; 23(4): 520 - 543. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Jafarpur Is the test constructor a facet? Language Testing, January 1, 2003; 20(1): 57 - 87. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. F. Bachman Modern language testing at the turn of the century: assuring that what we count counts Language Testing, January 1, 2000; 17(1): 1 - 42. [Abstract] [PDF]