Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Language Testing
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, C.
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The effect of prior knowledge on EAP listening-test performance

Christine Jensen

Christa Hansen

In this study we looked at whether prior study of a lecture topic enhanced performance on the lecture subtests of a content-based listening test. We postulated that listening proficiency level would affect whether prior knowl edge could be accessed and used: we hypothesized that listeners would need a high proficiency level to be able to use their prior knowledge. To examine these issues, we analyzed the data from 11 lecture subtests from the Test of Listening for Academic Purposes (T-LAP). We used a two-step multiple regression analysis to determine 1) if level of listening proficiency affects whether prior knowledge can be accessed and 2) if prior knowledge is a significant factor in performance on lecture subtests. Our findings did not support the hypothesis that high proficiency listeners who have indicated prior study of a topic will perform better on lecture comprehension than listening skills alone would predict. Although prior knowledge was a significant main effect for five of the 11 lectures, the effect size was trivial. However, the effect is more likely to be present in technical lectures than it is in non-technical lectures. These results indicate that we need to look at what features differentiate technical from non-technical lectures. Lecture dis course features, delivery style, and listening tasks promise to be fruitful areas for future research.

Language Testing, Vol. 12, No. 1, 99-119 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/026553229501200106


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RELC JournalHome page
A. C.-S. Chang and J. Read
Support for Foreign Language Listeners: Its Effectiveness and Limitations
RELC Journal, December 1, 2007; 38(3): 375 - 394.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language TestingHome page
H.-K. Lee and C. Anderson
Validity and topic generality of a writing performance test
Language Testing, July 1, 2007; 24(3): 307 - 330.
[Abstract] [PDF]