This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wall, D. Articles by Alderson, J. C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Examining washback: the Sri Lankan Impact Study

Lancaster University

J. Charles Alderson

Lancaster University

Language tests are frequently criticized for having negative impact on teaching — so-called 'negative washback'. Some writers believe that it is possible to bring about positive change in language teaching by changing tests. However, neither positive nor negative washback on classrooms has been established empirically by observation of classrooms. This article seeks to redress this situation by reporting on an innovative study of the impact of a new English examination in Sri Lanka on language teaching. Although impact is demonstrated on the content of teaching, no evidence was found for any influence of the test on how teachers taught. It is argued that studies of washback need to relate teachers' attitudes to and understanding of exams to observations of classrooms in order to understand why teachers teach the way they do, and why tests might not have the impact that is frequently asserted. It is concluded that the supposition of washback as currently formulated is an oversimplified account of the relationship between tests and teaching and it is suggested that the complexity of that relationship, and of curricular innovation more generally, needs further exploration.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Nkosana Attitudinal obstacles to curriculum and assessment reform Language Teaching Research, April 1, 2008; 12(2): 287 - 312. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Rea-Dickins So, why do we need relationships with stakeholders in language testing? A view from the UK Language Testing, November 1, 1997; 14(3): 304 - 314. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. M. Bailey Working for washback: a review of the washback concept in language testing Language Testing, November 1, 1996; 13(3): 257 - 279. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. C. Alderson and L. Hamp-Lyons TOEFL preparation courses: a study of washback Language Testing, November 1, 1996; 13(3): 280 - 297. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Y. Watanabe Does grammar translation come from the entrance examination? Preliminary findings from classroom-based research Language Testing, November 1, 1996; 13(3): 318 - 333. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Swain Second language testing and second language acquisition: is there a conflict with traditional psychometrics? Language Testing, July 1, 1993; 10(2): 193 - 207. [Abstract] [PDF]