Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Language Testing
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alderson, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Buck, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Standards in testing: a study of the practice of UK examination boards in EFL/ESL testing

J. Charles Alderson

Lancaster University

Gary Buck

East Texas State University

It is often asserted that the UK tradition in language testing is different from the North American tradition. Whereas in North America it is considered normal practice to examine the psychometric properties of tests, in the UK more emphasis is thought to be placed on test content. However, there has been no systematic study of this stereotypical view. The research reported in this article aimed to investigate the issue by examining the practices of UK EFL/ESL examination boards. A survey was carried out in two phases, using an open-ended instrument in phase one and a detailed questionnaire in phase two. The results, presented and discussed in some detail, show that no accepted standards exist which UK boards adhere to, that current practice and procedures followed by the boards vary greatly, but that information appears to exist within some boards which could attest to the quality of their examinations. However, that information is not publicly or easily available. The article argues that the time is ripe for the development of a set of standards boards should follow, and for a public discussion of those procedures that would be most appropriate to ensure that standards were met.

Language Testing, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1-26 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/026553229301000101
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?