Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Language Testing
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hudson, T.
Right arrow Articles by Lynch, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A criterion-referenced measurement approach to ESL achievement testing

Thom Hudson

University of California, LosAngeles

Brian Lynch

University of California, LosAngeles

The distinction between norm-referenced measurement (NRM) and criterion-referenced measurement (CRM) has become recognized as an issue in second-language testing. Traditional methods used to determine the reliability and validity of a test, as well as to analyse items for test improvement have been based on NRM principles. These traditional methods are not entirely appropriate for criterion-referenced tests designed to measure course achievement. This study presents approaches to test development item analysis, reliability and validity based on CRM principles. These CRM approaches are discussed and compared with NRM approaches in terms of the types of decisions which result from either approach. The study was conducted using data from an ESL achievement testing project currently in progress at UCLA. The results indicate that CRM approaches provide information not available through NRM methods.

Language Testing, Vol. 1, No. 2, 171-201 (1984)
DOI: 10.1177/026553228400100204
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Language TestingHome page
L. F. Bachman
Modern language testing at the turn of the century: assuring that what we count counts
Language Testing, January 1, 2000; 17(1): 1 - 42.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Language TestingHome page
B. K. Lynch and T. F. McNamara
Using G-theory and Many-facet Rasch measurement in the development of performance assessments of the ESL speaking skills of immigrants
Language Testing, April 1, 1998; 15(2): 158 - 180.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Language TestingHome page
T. Hudson
Surrogate indices for item information functions in criterion-referenced language testing
Language Testing, July 1, 1993; 10(2): 171 - 191.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Language TestingHome page
A. J. Kunnan
An investigation of a criterion- referenced test using G-theory, and factor and cluster analyses
Language Testing, June 1, 1992; 9(1): 30 - 49.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Language TestingHome page
T. Hudson
Relationships among IRT item discrimination and item fit indices in criterion-referenced language testing
Language Testing, December 1, 1991; 8(2): 160 - 181.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Language TestingHome page
J. D. Brown
Short-cut estimators of criterion-referenced test consistency
Language Testing, June 1, 1990; 7(1): 77 - 97.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social ScienceHome page
L. F. BACHMAN and J. L. D. CLARK
The Measurement of Foreign/Second Language Proficiency
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, March 1, 1987; 490(1): 20 - 33.
[Abstract]